An American survey revealed that marriages between the 1960s to 1980s where wives earned significantly higher than their husbands increased divørce rate by 50%
A 2021 study by the Institute for Family Studies in America, showed that marriages where the man’s income was significantly higher than the wife’s had the lowest divørce rate, which is 2.9%, in 2021
And marriages where the vvomen earned significantly higher than their husbands had a 8.4% chance of divørce
Also, marriages where the man earned moderately than the wife (which means they earn similar income) had a 4.8% chance of divørce.
This is to say that vvomen tend to initiate divørce when they earn similarly or out-earn their husbands due to their hypergamous doubts and desire to attract better men.
They run away when they feel like they’re going to be somewhat responsible for the family’s welfare. Like, they don’t want the men they earn better than to benefit from their money.
In egalitarian societies like Sweden, marriæges are twice likely to end within three years when the wife is promoted to high-status roles like a CEO or a political position, compared to male CEOs.
Which means, when the man wins, it’s a win for the family. But when the vvoman wins, it’s d|saster, she leaves.
Interestingly, families where couples view their earnings as household income rather than than person earnings, report higher satisfaction and less likelihood of divørce
This is consistent with what I’ve been saying so far. If a man sets the frame for relationship and supervises the affairs, including how income is spent, the couple tend to stay glued together. This can only happen in a union where the man didn’t beg his wife to marry him.
But at the end of the day, vvomen’s so|ipsistic nature is still evident in these marriages, regardless of who earns more. For instance;
Marriages where the man earns more and the wife does most household chores report lower satisfaction because the vvomen won’t stop nagging and complaining of inequality
Even stay-at-home moms insist their husbands must help out with chores, otherwise they’ll be unhappy. It doesn’t matter to them that the man is the only one bringing money home. They don’t think the men are being cheated in that aspect.
Also, households where the couple earn similar income and the wife does more chores report even higher dissatisfaction because the wives feel they’re being cheated and are unevenly carrying the family’s responsibilities, and want the men to help out with more chores.
Again, households where the vvomen earn higher and do any chores at all, whether more or less, report the highest rate of dissatisfaction because the vvomen do not want to do chores at all since they earn more.
Meanwhile, households where the man earns more and does most or all of the chores report the highest level of satisfaction.
In such marriages, the vvomen feel good because they’re not obligated to take up responsibilities at all, and their men refuse to complain since it keeps their wives happy. You know “happy wife, happy life” 🤡
What this means is that vvomen envisage marriages where they’re completely uzeless and only relax to be taken care of
Which is consistent with the notion that vvomen believe men exist to sμffer for them and lift their burdens.
They don’t want to have responsibilities at all. That’s why they nag, complain and feel varying degrees of dissatisfaction in marriages that put them on their toes and causes them to be useful to their husbands.
A good example in our clime, is the video that was trending a few months ago, where a husband returned from a long business trip and headed to kitchen immediately to cook for his family, whereas his wife sat ideally in the sitting room.
She was home all day but wasn’t decent enough to welcome her husband who returned from a long journey in a grand style
All vvomen were cheering him on as the perfect example of what a husband should be — a happy s|ave for vvomen
Meanwhile, if it was a vvoman who posted a video of herself making a meal for her husband who returned home from work before her, they’d drag her to fi|th. It pains vvomen to see a vvoman being useful to a man in the littlest way.
Remember when they dragged Mummy Zee for waking up by 4:30 to make breakfast for her husband and also pack his lunch? Exactly!
VVomen keep fighting for their right to be uzeless to men, while expecting same men to be happy s|aves for them. They don’t understand equality, neither do they want it. They want happy s|aves. They only talk about equality because it’s a mainstream topic now.
That’s why they get pissed off when you speak of gender roles that requires vvomen to be useful. Yet every feminist believes it’s a man’s responsibility to provide and protect — which are also gender roles too.
Ụmụ nwanyị a na-eche na umu nwoke bu oru ha. Odiegwu!